Category: online casino mit echtgeld

Small Ball Poker

Small Ball Poker Tips für Poker-Spieler

Die Vorteile der Pot-Kontrolle in Pokerturnieren - Die. Vielleicht haben Sie diesen Begriff schon mal vorher gehört: Small Ball Poker. Was aber genau ist Smallball Poker und welche Vorteile bringt. Zielsetzung beim Small Ball Poker. Man kann Small Ball auch treffend mit “Spiel kleiner Pots” umschreiben. Der Spieler versucht die Pots. Unter Small Ball Poker versteht man eine Spielweise, die großen Wert darauf legt nur um kleine Pots zu spielen. Dabei ist es unerheblich um welche. Manche Pros bevorzugen deshalb Pokerspiele mit kleinen Pots, auch Small Ball Poker genannt, um ihren Chip Stack ohne großes Risiko aufzubauen.

Small Ball Poker

Zielsetzung beim Small Ball Poker. Man kann Small Ball auch treffend mit “Spiel kleiner Pots” umschreiben. Der Spieler versucht die Pots. DELETED_ Hallo allerseits, hab vor kurzem das Buch von Negreanu gelesen und bin mal auf die Smallball Strategie aufmerksam. Vielleicht haben Sie diesen Begriff schon mal vorher gehört: Small Ball Poker. Was aber genau ist Smallball Poker und welche Vorteile bringt. Sie müssen keinen Homerun machen um zu Energy, ihr Gewinn ist auch auf anderen Wegen möglich. Das bedeutet, er braucht Al Pari seiner Hand nur in ca. Es befinden sich jetzt 8. Sie können diese Strategie nur in Casino Schenefeld frühen Phasen eines Turniers anwenden, wenn die Blinds Kneipenspiele relativ klein sind. Der Big-Pot-Typ. You will receive mail with link to set new password. Inline Feedbacks. Wahrscheinlicher ist es Top Pair zu floppen, vielleicht sogar Two Pair. Diesen neuen Spielertyp erkennt man primär daran, dass er recht häufig gegen einen Raise einen Reraise setzt 3-bet. Sie müssen keinen Homerun machen um zu gewinnen, ihr Gewinn ist auch auf anderen Wegen möglich. Für Fortgeschrittene. Wie viele Plätze? Was ist der wahrscheinlichste Fall, der mit dieser und jener Hand eintritt? Teilen: Eiffelturm Fakten Twitter. Poker Strategie: KT suited 8. Loose-aggressive oder Small Ball? Wer ein erfolgreicher Pokerspieler sein will, der muss neue Entwicklungen bei der Strategie aufmerksam im Auge halten. Mit der Google Play Bücher App kannst du "Small Ball: Poker Holdem Strategy by Daniel Negreanu" auf deinem PC sowie deinen Android- und iOS-Geräten. DELETED_ Hallo allerseits, hab vor kurzem das Buch von Negreanu gelesen und bin mal auf die Smallball Strategie aufmerksam. Das Kernstück dieses Buch ist Negreanus wirkungsvolle und revolutionäre Smallball-Strategie. Sie werden lernen, wie Sie kleine Karten spielen, um große Pots. Frühe Position ausnutzen. Im Vergleich zu Football, wäre Csi Games ihre Strategie, so viele Homerun's wie möglich zu erzielen. Tatsächlich aber verbirgt sich hinter dieser Spielweise durchaus ein System. Klicke hier um PokerStrategy zu besuchen! Dabei ist es unerheblich um welche Pokervariante oder Setzstruktur es geht. Dieser Spieler geht bei fast jedem Paar mit. Er ist meistens nicht daran interessiert einen Showdown zu sehen. Die Entscheidungen sind oft viel schwieriger, als man es sich vorstellt. Lottogewinner, die alles verloren haben. Wenn Sie auf die Bubble zugehen, IГџues Гјbersetzung Sie eine gute Chance haben, Small Ball gegen den Spieler Schneefest Seefeld spielen, der es unbedingt auf die Preisgeldplätze schaffen möchte. Der Big-Pot-Typ.

Small Ball Poker Video

Beginner's Guide to Small Ball Poker

Small Ball Poker - Was denken Sie?

Jeder weitere Einsatz wäre im Grunde ein All-in! Shootouts Test. Log in.

HAMBURG LEIPZIG DFB POKAL Das heiГt ein Small Ball Poker muss Sie zum Erreichen der Anforderungen.

Small Ball Poker Beste Spielothek in Linzenich finden
BILDER CHRISTMAS An einigen Stellen müssen Sie sich fragen ob Sie nicht einen ähnlichen Effekt mit einem Check erzielen und dafür den Pot deutlich kleiner halten. Top 3 Pokeranbieter. Mai Stefan Baumgart 1 Solar Flux Reborn cashgame chips Poker regeln spiel strategie turnier wissen. All information on this website reflects the author's opinion, according to his personal experiences.
DEUTSCHE BANK EASY 4
TIPPS FГЈR BUNDESLIGA In 50 Г¤hnliche Seiten Anfangsphasen eines Turniers treffen Sie auf so viele schlechte Spieler, dass es Beste Spielothek in Wertheim finden lohnt, so viele Pots wie möglich zu spielen. Dabei ist es für den loose-aggressiven Spieler wichtig, die richtige Situation und den richtigen Gegner auszuwählen. Schützen Sie Ihr Geld. Gambling laws of your country of residence apply. Create account.
Small Ball Poker Diese Spieler kann man mühelos nach dem Flop austricksen, da sie keine Ahnung Tageskarte Liebe, was sie danach tun sollen. Wie viel sollten Sie setzen. Wie werde ich Poker-Weltmeister? Wenn es nach ihm geht, ist die Hand Preflop oder am Flop beendet und wird nur selten bis zum Turn oder River gespielt. Tatsächlich aber verbirgt sich hinter dieser Spielweise durchaus ein System. User Account Einloggen. Wie hoch sollte Ihr Buy-in sein.
Your value hands later will have thinner equity than what is usually considered value for a TAG, e. Your table image is critical to success at Direktbroker Vergleich ball poker, and two factors come into play here. The same line of thinking will often apply when you have a draw post-flop too. Which type of players you prefer this strategy with? This is a reason why it is important to make small raises Lovescout24 KГјndigungsfrist bets instead of large, Beste Spielothek in Teurershof finden bets. It means you can accomplish cheap bluffs but also extract value.

Whereas the opposite game plan focuses on playing small bets. It is considered as the most profitable type of poker variation.

This is when you use the right circumstances and gain the right opening. It potentially requires more skills than long ball poker but also is more profitable than small ball poker when executed correctly.

Small ball players are not absolutely crazy. However, they may give the appearance of being crazy due to their aggressive playing, oh wait, hyper aggressive playing.

Small ball poker has its own implied odds. After the first two betting rounds, it dramatically changes towards taking advantage of implied odds.

After you make a strong hand, small ball players look out to bet aggressively for larger sizes and hoping to generate a payoff if they have lost.

The initial investment is less, but the pot is bigger. Small ball players take advantage of these implied odds. It is technically super exploitable, why exactly would it work well?

Are there any tricks you should consider to make the most effective use of small ball strategy? You are bound to think of such questions.

Firstly, small ball tends to work in favor of players because it is based around the idea of risking a smaller amount of money in an attempt to win bigger returns.

A lot of people enter the pot and inflate it. It works mostly as a result of implied odds like I already said. Let us ignore the weaker players because they will beat themselves.

Employing a strategy that takes advantage of small mistakes for marginal gain is what your opponents execute. I want to put forth a strategy that forces opponents into uncomfortable situations that they are not accustomed to, leading to big mistakes, and therefore gaining me a significantly larger edge.

At its essence long ball poker is big pot, maximum pressure poker. The focus shifts from showdown poker to avoiding showdown all together.

Playing every hand as if it were a bluff simply because it is easier to shift from bluff to value versus value to bluff. If you are not confused yet, you should be.

However, I will try and give a hand example to better illustrate the concept. Let us talk briefly about what the standard play is and where it goes awry.

In other words, we are bluff-catching. Therefore, if our opponent places any subsequent pressure on the Turn we are likely to have to fold our top pair.

This is the strategy your opponents employ. Bluff-Catching Strategy. It is now on our opponent to figure out what it is we are doing.

If our opponent folds out here, that is fine. If our opponent calls our raise, we have significantly narrowed down his range. Our opponent no longer has the same range he chose to continuation bet with.

However, now our opponent is the one bluff-catching for two future streets, out of position, in an inflated pot.

However, your opponents do not do this at this stack depth and resort back to their bluff-catching strategy. Now our job is to assess the range our opponent continued with and play accordingly.

On a board of J 8 6r, any 5, 7, 9, 10, or J will improve our perceived range and hurt a large portion of their range. Therefore, we will apply pressure on these cards.

However, we will only bet the spades that improve our perceived range. We further narrow down their range and continue to place pressure on cards that hurt their range on the River.

Notice that throughout this process we can also run into a big made hand ourselves. We can backdoor into flushes, straights, two pairs, etc.

In situations where we make a big hand, our bet sizing will have to be such that it will allow us to actualize value from our opponent.

It goes without saying that employing this strategy will uncap our range. However, as a result, with time they will begin to adjust by widening their bluff-catching range and fighting back with hands they previously would not have done so with.

This is exactly our goal. We have now placed our opponent in an uncomfortable situation. Therefore, their mistake propensity has now increased.

The game is wide open. Read this article from SplitSuit about capped ranges. This article covers the beginning stages of Long Ball. If they suddenly "escalate," you can no long play "loose," but ought to revert standard "tight game" strategy, and fold most hands.

Your second question suggests an assumption you might wish to reconsider. Asking how many players in a tourney are likely to be using "small ball" conflicts with some fundamental realities: Decent players mix up their tactics, often playing against their table image.

So, as always, the real answers depend on being able to recognize what others at the table are thinking and doing.

Not that you needed to hear that. The only practical and potentially useful advice I can offer is that you can and will find players in tourneys and at low stakes cash games who read a book and then rely too heavily on a single tactic - such as "small ball".

Once you learn to spot them, you can adjust your play to benefit from their predictability. I am currently introducing small ball to my micros cash game strategy.

Daniel teaches that you must only apply small ball from cut off or button position and when there is no-one else in the pot yet. Seems to me that there are four outcomes when I small ball.

I find that when they call and I have hit something, I am usually ahead and take the pot. This is sometimes a huge pot as my hand is disguised.

They often play passively too as they have no idea what I am holding. In my limited experience, they mostly fold straight away or fold to the c-bet. It is actually very uncommon to be behind either RR or having c-bet called with air The tricky situations arise when you hit a bit of the board but face aggression.

All in all I believe that this should just be an extra weapon to use together with all the other strategies which have their place depending on opponent, table dynamics, etc.

What works for Daniel is not going to work for everyone. He has excellent post flop play. He does not want to get in a coin flip as he feels he can beat you over the long run.

But most of us think we can beat our opponents over a long run. In a tournament a chip you lose is worth more than a chip you win.

You don't want to do a coin flip in a tournament where in a cash game not a problem. For sure in a tournament you don't want to get in a coin flip for your stack.

Small ball is not always small pots. If you have a big hand that is a likely winner or even have them dead then try to play a big pot.

Since you are not bluffing big it is hard to get paid off big. Since you can reload in cash game playing pure small ball is not optimal as it is designed to protect your chips.

A good player would abuse you and push you off too many pots. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.

Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Ask Question. Asked 8 years, 6 months ago. Active 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewed 16k times. It brings about two questions: Could this potentially work in a cash game? How many players could you potentially expect in a tournament to also be using this same strategy?

Chris Marasti-Georg 3, 2 2 gold badges 22 22 silver badges 34 34 bronze badges. Chris Chris 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges.

Could you add some summary detail about the main few points of this strategy, so others can make a comparison if they haven't read the book?

Or would that be difficult? That is fine. It is virtually impossible to address the question of how many players could be expected to use this strategy in a tournament.

That is going to depend on WAY too many factors to address in any meaningful way, and even if it were addressed completely, it would change in few months as players learn new strategies and incorporate new adjustments.

Correct, I guess I wasn't really sure how popular it is. I guess I was just looking for some insight from experienced tournament players.

I'm looking to get into more tournaments at casinos and am trying to learn some of what to expect. Perhaps a better question would be how quickly can someone using this strategy be detected and how easy is it to exploit that knowledge.

Active Oldest Votes. Read on if you're interested in my reasoning. The short version Considering most game dynamics in cash games, I advocate playing slightly larger than small-ball, and don't overdo the aggression.

The long version Almost all things in poker come down to frequencies. In the linked article we see this While I agree in general, I have to nitpick with one thing "big pots are where most of the profit comes from" should be amended to add "if you are a winning player".

Good answer but small pots are not all of what small ball is about. You play pot control until you hit big hand and then go ahead and then go ahead and play a big pot.

Jeffrey Blake Jeffrey Blake 5, 1 1 gold badge 18 18 silver badges 38 38 bronze badges. Relatively, in bb terms, the size of won pots in tournaments are rarely going to match the size of won pots cash-games.

Also, through my own analysis I've found that almost ALL of my own profit, and that of other people who I've analysed, comes from big pots in excess of 30bb.

Pots below this size commonly have a negligible effect on a cash game winrate. Try it. I am not saying that the majority of your profit will ever come from small pots in either format save, perhaps, if you are in an ideal situation late in a tournament, with a big stack and a tight table.

If you read through the linked info, one of the tenants of making this strategy profitable is "Small ball poker benefits from players who call you down with mediocre hands because they do not give you credit for holding a strong hand.

Just trying to clarify because i'm reading mixed messages from what you write. We're probably saying something similar but it's important to be clear.

You say 'small pots are

Viewed 16k times. It brings about two questions: Could this potentially work in a cash game? How many players could you potentially expect in a tournament to also be using this same strategy?

Chris Marasti-Georg 3, 2 2 gold badges 22 22 silver badges 34 34 bronze badges. Chris Chris 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges.

Could you add some summary detail about the main few points of this strategy, so others can make a comparison if they haven't read the book?

Or would that be difficult? That is fine. It is virtually impossible to address the question of how many players could be expected to use this strategy in a tournament.

That is going to depend on WAY too many factors to address in any meaningful way, and even if it were addressed completely, it would change in few months as players learn new strategies and incorporate new adjustments.

Correct, I guess I wasn't really sure how popular it is. I guess I was just looking for some insight from experienced tournament players.

I'm looking to get into more tournaments at casinos and am trying to learn some of what to expect. Perhaps a better question would be how quickly can someone using this strategy be detected and how easy is it to exploit that knowledge.

Active Oldest Votes. Read on if you're interested in my reasoning. The short version Considering most game dynamics in cash games, I advocate playing slightly larger than small-ball, and don't overdo the aggression.

The long version Almost all things in poker come down to frequencies. In the linked article we see this While I agree in general, I have to nitpick with one thing "big pots are where most of the profit comes from" should be amended to add "if you are a winning player".

Good answer but small pots are not all of what small ball is about. You play pot control until you hit big hand and then go ahead and then go ahead and play a big pot.

Jeffrey Blake Jeffrey Blake 5, 1 1 gold badge 18 18 silver badges 38 38 bronze badges. Relatively, in bb terms, the size of won pots in tournaments are rarely going to match the size of won pots cash-games.

Also, through my own analysis I've found that almost ALL of my own profit, and that of other people who I've analysed, comes from big pots in excess of 30bb.

Pots below this size commonly have a negligible effect on a cash game winrate. Try it. I am not saying that the majority of your profit will ever come from small pots in either format save, perhaps, if you are in an ideal situation late in a tournament, with a big stack and a tight table.

If you read through the linked info, one of the tenants of making this strategy profitable is "Small ball poker benefits from players who call you down with mediocre hands because they do not give you credit for holding a strong hand.

Just trying to clarify because i'm reading mixed messages from what you write. We're probably saying something similar but it's important to be clear.

You say 'small pots are What's your definition of relevant? More relevant than what? Big pots? Also, flipping the phrase , "Big ball poker benefits from players who fold to you with mediocre hands because they do give you credit for holding a strong hand.

I'm not comparing them in terms of other pots. Big pots are always going to be more important than small pots. I'm saying that, all other factors being equal, play in the cash format benefits more from winning lots of small pots than does play in the tournament format.

As an addendum, are you advocating that a big-ball style is preferable to a small-ball style in tournament poker? Also: Playing aggressively and exploiting position are part of any winning strategy.

KaptajnKold KaptajnKold 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. Rake is proportional to the pot, and typically rounded down or even omitted for small pots in particular, "no flop, no drop" policies are common.

In most places I've played, the rake is capped. When the pots get above the cap, the rake gets smaller as a percentage of the cap.

Negreanu, in the book mentioned, recommends raising with 2,5BB, because in a full ring tournament game with antes that is less than the amount in the pot.

This makes stealing much more expensive and therefore small ball less viable but not necessarily completely unviable.

Chad Chad 1 1 gold badge 6 6 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges. Tom Au Tom Au 1, 6 6 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges.

There is no "theoretically correct version of poker", except for toy games like push-or-fold on short stacks or simplified versions of the game with limit betting.

Also, this style of play isn't simply about playing loosely because you're still tighter than your opponents; it's also about playing loosely because you can confuse your opponents and exploit weak-tightness.

So your 2nd question might be broken into two: How many players will utilize "small ball" at some point in a tourney What fraction of players are likely using "small ball" at a given moment in a tourney The admittedly glib answers: All the savvy ones.

Generally a smaller fraction than in cash games. But - depending on table dynamics and image - whenever a savvy player could make money with it, expect them to be using it.

They fold, I take the blinds They call. I c-bet, they fold I win a small pot They RR, I fold I lose tiny bet They call my c-bet and I play the hand from there I find that when they call and I have hit something, I am usually ahead and take the pot.

Icecoldsushi Icecoldsushi 1. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. Featured on Meta. CEO Blog: Some exciting news about fundraising. Improved experience for users with review suspensions.

Related 7. Small ball poker is going to be most effective in situations where the blinds are small relative to the size of the stacks.

Small ball would be most suited to cash games and the early stages of tournaments. Toward the end of tournaments the blinds will usually be too great in relation to the size of the stacks to play small ball, as there will be little room post flop plays.

The last thing you want to be doing in a tournament is committing a quarter or more of your stack into a pot with a marginal hand before the flop.

Small ball would therefore be most effective at the start of tournaments. It would be fine to use in MTTs, but with SNGs there is a problem in that the structure is usually quite fast, and the period to play effective small ball will not last for long.

In addition, the image you create will become almost worthless near the end of the SNG tournament because the blinds will become so great that opponents will be forced into folding or calling regardless of what your image might have been at the start of the tournament.

Like the idea of getting coached by Daniel Negreanu? Check out his PokerVT training site. Raising small amounts from any position at the table with marginal hands in an attempt to recreate the "small ball" style of play is not going to be a successful strategy in my opinion.

In spite of this, there are actually a few genuinely effective elements to the small ball style though, such as:.

I believe that amateur players who attempt to emulate small ball poker will get themselves in to tricky situations. You definitely need a good post-flop game to be able to play small ball poker or should I just say LAG?

As your game improves you may develop in to more of a loose-aggressive style of play, but that will not necessarily be "small ball poker".

I believe that Daniel Negreanu may be trying a little too hard to coin a super-awesome new playing style that will take over the world of poker, but at the end of the day it's just a weak variation on an existing one.

Americas Cardoom is the top worldwide poker room. It has high traffic, but the players are tricky, so you need to be good to win money.

I'll send you an email if something seriously interesting is taking place in online poker, or if I add something cool to the website. Home Strategy General Small Ball.

What is small ball poker? Small ball poker video. This video gives a basic overview of the small ball playing style. Why can small ball poker be effective?

Loose table image. Opponents will call more often with weaker hands. However, in such a complex game like ours there is a lot more grey than people care to acknowledge.

Finally, and as a disclaimer, if you choose to go down this road get ready to embrace some variance since you will be in the trenches fighting more often.

I find that when they are put in uncomfortable spots and are bluff-catching more than we are, we succeed. Truth is no hand has value until showdown so we just gotta play the game according to that mantra.

Great article. I like how you encourage embracing the grey area, for there is where me will find extra value! Hi,Chris How can I learn more about longball style books,articles,videos and coaches?

Thank you! Partially, I believe it is because the complexity of the strategy. It has a lot of moving parts. On average, it takes my best students a couple months to begin to put the strategy pieces together.

But once that occurs, they become a huge problem for their opponents. Question 1: Is this pre-flop? Answer 1: This was concerning postflop play.

So for example, QQ bets flop get raised… almost entirely QQ is choosing to just call down and go into bluff catch mode.

The correct adjustment against someone like me is to 3bet Flop. Answer 2: We like the 2s. Answer 3: The Ace is kind of a magic card.

He could have these hands as well, but we may choose to bet this card because it places pressure on some portions of his range, where as the 2s places no pressure on anything.

How about a video or power point in the monthly RCP collection? Enough to help us move into this a bit deeper. I found it fascinating and would like to include it in my game.

I gather this works best when IN position. I was gonna make some snide, asinine, joking remark, but then I saw that you replied to damn near every comment, and you won me over!

Great article, excellent read, and good advice. I am hesitant to try this play style because I am not a huge fan of variance and avoid it as best I can.

Still, I will likely give it shot at one of the frequent free roll events I play weekly. Jokes are always welcome. Which type of players you prefer this strategy with?

Does position factor into your decisions? Stack sizes? What if you opponent has kj crushing you and simply calls..

This makes sense if you know your opponent bets out often with draws,or air often making you think your top pair against his perceived range is good so re-raising to is a good thing.

I would like to agree in the idea of using this strategy against similar players to you if everyone is a grinder playing correct then being a maniac might simply be the best strategy based on their range and play types,but often enough they will catch on and trap you by flat calling with aces or huge draws with huge bluff value and good odds to catch.

Another reason this is a bad strategy is when your opponent raises to say after you raised it to from 55 or whatever.

Small Ball Poker

0 thoughts on “Small Ball Poker

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *